12 septembre 2021

An important inscribed archaic ritual archaic food vessel (Ding), Late Shang dynasty, 13th - 11th century BC

téléchargement (17)

téléchargement (19)

téléchargement (18)

téléchargement (20)

téléchargement (21)

téléchargement (22)

Lot 31. An important inscribed archaic ritual bronze food vessel (Ding), Late Shang dynasty, 13th - 11th century BC. Height 10¼ in., 26 cmEstimate: 800,000 - 1,200,000 USDLot sold: 1,472,000 USD. © Sotheby's 2021

the deep rounded body supported on three cylindrical legs, the lipped rim with two large upright loop handles, the body cast with three large taotie masks with bulging eyes intersected by vertical flanges, all against a fine leiwen ground, below a band of six serpents interspersed with whorl-roundels in relief, the legs with scrolls and pendent cicadas all in intaglio, the interior cast on the side with a six-character inscription, the vessel with an attractive olive patina with areas of malachite encrustation.


ProvenanceCollection of David A. Berg (1904-1999).
Collection of Harvard University Art Museums, Cambridge, received as a bequest from the above.
Christie's New York, 21st September 2000, lot 160.
Sotheby's London, 19th June 2002, lot 73.
Asian Private Collection.
Sotheby's New York, 17th March 2015, lot 107.
Literature: Wang Chen, Xuyinwencun [Continuation of the surviving writings from the Yin dynasty], vol. 1, 1935, p. 21.
Luo Zhenyu, Sandai jijin wencun [Surviving writings from the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties], vol. 3, 1937, p. 1.
Yan Yiping, Jinwen Zongji, [Corpus of Bronze Inscriptions], Taipei, 1983, no. 0753.
The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, ed., Yin Zhou jinwen jichengshiwen [Interpretations of the compendium of Yin and Zhou bronze inscriptions], vol. 2, Hong Kong, 2001, no. 2113.
Wang Xiantang, Guoshi jinshizhi gao [Manuscript of archaic bronze in Chinese history], Qingdao, 2004, p. 2011, no. 241.
The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, ed., Yin Zhou jinwen jicheng [Compendium of Yin and Zhou bronze inscriptions], Beijing, 2007, no. 02113.
Wang Tao and Liu Yu, A Selection of Early Chinese Bronzes with Inscriptions from Sotheby's and Christie's Sales, Shanghai, 2007, pl. 60.
Wang Xinyi, ed., Shangzhou tuxingwenzi bian [Catalogue of pictograms from the Shang and Zhou dynasties], Beijing, 2007, p. 389.
Wu Zhenfeng, Shang Zhou qingtongqi mingwen ji tuxiang jicheng [Compendium of inscriptions and images of bronzes from Shang and Zhou dynasties], vol. 3, Shanghai, 2012, no. 01499.
Yan Zhibin, ed., Shangdai qingtongqi mingwen fenqi duandai yanjiu / The Dating Study of Bronze Inscriptions of the Shang Dynasty, vol. 1, Beijing, 2014, p. 340, no. 0865-02113 and vol. 2, p. 1019, no. 0865.

NoteShang dynasty bronze inscriptions longer than three or four characters are extremely rare. This exceptional ding vessel is cast with a six-character inscription reading Quan zuxin zugui Xiang, written in a vigorous manner that exudes the beauty of the ancient pictographic characters. The present vessel is most remarkable, however, for the content of its inscription. The inscription identifies that Quan was the person who commissioned the vessel, and zuxin and zugui were the ancestors to whom ritual offerings were made. The last character, xiang, should be a clan emblem, which can also be seen on other Shang bronzes. The quan (dog) character on Shang dynasty bronzes may refer to the title of an official responsible for organizing hunts, who also participated in warfare (see Chen Mengjia, p. 514); it may also be the name of a clan, in which case the owner the present ding would have belonged to the Quan clan, with its related clan being Xiang (see Yan Zhibin, p. 296).

Ding are among the most significant ritual vessels associated with authority and supremacy. Owners of ding were of elite social status, such as high officials or clan leaders. Late Shang dynasty oracle bone inscriptions record a person named Quan Hou, who was an important noble of the period. Quan Hou was likely a senior military leader who had served in the Shang king’s conquest of the enemy tribes. Ding Shan suggests that Quan Hou was the houya, a minister of the Shang inner court (see Ding Shan, p. 116). Yan Zhibing has further proposed that Quan Hou was in fact the leader of the Quan clan (op. cit., p. 116).

In his series of studies of oracle bones, Liu Huan has reconstructed the lineage of the Quan clan. Initially, the Quan clan was an enemy of the Shang state, as documented in an oracle bone inscription reading Jiyou bu, zhen: Que wang zheng Quan, which clearly records that the Shang kingdom sent Que to attack Quan (see Guo Moruo, no. 6979). In another oracle bone inscription, reading Zhen: wei bei Quan pu, the diviner inquired about punishing the slaves of the Quan clan (ibid., no. 565). See also the oracle bone inscription reading Yimao bu, yun, zhen: Ling Duozizu bi Quanhou kou Zhou, Yewang shi, which records that the Shang king ordered the Douzi clan and Quan Hou to attack the Zhou tribe (ibid., no. 6812). By the time this last oracle bone was produced, the Quan clan had submitted to the Shang dynasty and become one of its major military forces, with Quan Hou as its leader. In a further oracle bone inscription, reading Xinyou zhen: Quan shou nian, the diviner asked about the harvest in Quan lands, which indicates that the Quan clan was also responsible for agricultural production, in addition to their military duty (see ibid., nos 9793 and 9794; for additional details, see Liu Huan, pp 1-2).

The territory of the Quan clan is a subject of much scholarly debate and remains an open question. Yan Zhibin has summarized the various theories (see Yan Zhibin, pp 297-298). Some scholars, including Hu Houxuan and Chen Mengjia, hold that the Quan clan hailed from west of the Shang state, i.e., present-day Shaanxi and Shanxi. Chen Fangquan, Yu Taishan, and others believe the Quan clan originally lived east of the Shang. Some scholars locate its lands in present-day Shandong. Others position them at the intersection of Shandong, Henan, and Jiangsu and argue that the Quan clan later migrated westward and settled in the west of the Shang empire.

Yang Shuda identifies the Quan clan as the people alternately referred to in the historical record as Kunyi or Hunyi, and as Quanyi or Quanrong (see Yang Shuda, p. 62). Liu Huan, who shares the same opinion, has furthermore demonstrated that Quanrong was also called Xianyun (see Liu Huan, pp 3-4). The name Quanrong is well known from the famous story of King You of the Western Zhou dynasty ordering beacon towers lit and panicking the nobles simply to make his concubine Baosi laugh. According to ‘Zhou Benji’ [Annals of Zhou] in Shiji [Record of the Historian], ‘King You elevated Guo Shifu to the post of minister … causing grievance throughout the populace … King You also demoted Shen Hou (Queen Shen)… Shen Hou (Marquis Shen), incensed, aligned with the state of Zeng and the western Quanrong to attack King You. King You had beacons lit to summon his troops, but the troops did not come. Shen Hou then killed King You on the foothills of Mount Li.’ This battle resulted directly in the fall of the Western Zhou dynasty, signifying the importance of the Quanrong and the Quan clan in Chinese history. 

Aside from the importance of its inscription, the present ding is notable also for its unusual combination of decorative motifs. The primary motifs are large taotie masks, and the neck of the vessel features serpent and whorl flame patterns. Such a combination is extremely rare, although a very similar vessel with the same decorative elements is known. See a bronze ding originally in the Qing imperial collection, included in Xiqing Gujian [Xiqing catalogue of ancient bronzes] (fig. 1), and later entered the collection of Wu Dacheng (1835-1902), who transcribed its inscription in his Kezhai jigu lu [Kezhai’s compendium of ancient bronzes] and reproduced a full-figured rubbing of it in his Kezhai jigu tu [Kezhai’s illustrations of ancient bronzes], published in Zhou Ya, ed., Kezhai jigulu jianzhu [Annotated edition of Kezhai’s illustrations of ancient bronzes], Shanghai, 2012, p. 54. Other comparable vessels usually feature the more generic dragon patterns on the neck, such as one example excavated from a Shang tomb in Luoshan county, Henan, in 1980 and published in Wu Zhenfeng, Shang Zhou qingtongqi mingwen ji tuxiang jicheng [Compendium of inscriptions and images of bronzes from Shang and Zhou dynasties], vol. 2, Shanghai, 2012, no. 00884. Another example, in the collection of the Nelson-Atkins Museum in Kansas City, is published in Robert Bagley, Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collections, Washington, D.C., 1984, p. 466, fig. 86.1. A third example, in the collection of the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, U.K., is published in The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, ed., Yin Zhou jinwen jicheng [Compendium of Yin and Zhou bronze inscriptions], Beijing, 2007, no. 01085.

téléchargement (23)

 fig. 1. An archaic archaic ritual food vessel (ding), illustrated in Xiqing gujian, vol. 1, 1755, p. 28

Literature: Chen Mengjia, Yinxu buci zongshu [A Survey of Divinatory Inscriptions from Yinxu], Beijing, 1956.
Ding Shan, Jiaguwen suo jian shizu ji qi zhidao [Noble clans mentioned in Oracle Bone inscriptions and the nobility system], Beijing, 1988.
Guo Moruo, ed., Jiaguwen heji [Compendium of Oracle Bone inscriptions], Beijing, 1999.
Liu Huan, Jiagu, Jinwen zhong suo jian de Quanrong yu Xianyun [Quanrong and Xianyun mentioned in Oracle Bone and bronze inscriptions], Yindu Journal, Issue 2, Henan, 1994.
Yan Zhibin, Shangdai qingtongqi mingwen yanjiu [A Study of Bronze Inscriptions of the Shanghai Dynasty, Shanghai], 2017.
Yang Shuda, Jiweiju Jiawenshuo: Buci suoji [Jiwei Studio on Oracle Bone inscriptions: assorted records of divinatory texts], vol. 2, Beijing, 1954.

Sotheby's. Important Chinese Art, New York, 21 September 2021


Commentaires sur An important inscribed archaic ritual archaic food vessel (Ding), Late Shang dynasty, 13th - 11th century BC

Nouveau commentaire