Canalblog
Editer l'article Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Alain.R.Truong
Alain.R.Truong
Visiteurs
Depuis la création 51 154 044
Archives
Newsletter
Alain.R.Truong
21 septembre 2023

'Why have there been no great women artists?' at the Museum of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg

Why-2

Katherine Read, Scottish, 1723–1779, Portrait of a Woman, c. 1765, Pastel on paper, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Ross, Museum of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg.

ST. PETERSBURG, FL.- The Museum of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg, has announced the reattribution of a key work in the collection. In 1969 the MFA was gifted an exceptional pastel portrait long believed to be by noted British painter Francis Cotes. The sitter, an elegant woman in a fur-trimmed coat, was identified as the artist’s wife, whom he married in 1765. This attribution remained unchallenged for over fifty years, yet it is now determined to be incorrect. Current scholarship reveals that the work is almost certainly by Katherine Read, another equally important, though historically less well-known, artist.

Read’s Portrait of a Woman was recently on view as part of the exhibition Explore the Vaults: Images Private and Public, c. 1500–1800, and its reattribution is the inspiration for an upcoming talk focused on Linda Nochlin’s* groundbreaking 1971 essay “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” presented by Senior Curator of Contemporary Art Katherine Pill. “The reattribution serves as a vital reminder that the art historical canon is not fixed, and the story of art continues to unfold. As an encyclopedic art museum, we are presented with a valuable opportunity to conduct research that elevates marginalized artists to prominence within the unfolding narrative of art. This is especially crucial for artists whose exclusion, as evidenced by Nochlin’s work, arose from multifaceted factors that surpassed pure talents alone,” states Pill. The talk, to be held on Thursday, September 21, from 6-7 p.m. at the Museum of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg, will explore the institutional barriers obstructing women’s progress in the arts, delving into the epic struggle they faced in achieving success.

Neil Jeffares, author of Dictionary of Pastellists before 1800, identifies the MFA’s pastel as the work of Read, a highly sought-after professional portraitist active in London, Paris, and Rome. A comparison between the MFA’s portrait and other works by her reveals strong aesthetic and compositional similarities, including the soft handling of her sitters’ facial features and the incorporation of blue undertones along the hairline, eyes, and chin. Like many of her male contemporaries, she exhibited publicly with such institutions as the London Society of Artists and the Royal Academy.

Spearheading the research of this work is Associate Curator Erin Wilson, who acknowledges there is still much to discover. Wilson states, “It is not uncommon for the names of artists to become disassociated from their works over the centuries, especially when—like the MFA’s portrait—they are unsigned. Now that we know this is a work by Read, we have the opportunity to better trace its history perhaps, even discover the identity of the sitter. This reattribution provides a greater understanding of Read’s body of work and allows us, as an institution, to present a clearer, more balanced interpretation of eighteenth-century professional artistic practice.”

Katherine Read joins the company of other notable women artists in the MFA Collection, including Berthe Morisot, Georgia O’Keeffe, Elisabeth Louise Vigée-Lebrun, Cindy Sherman, Perle Fine, Gio Swaby, and many more.

*Linda Nochlin achieved acclaim as an esteemed art critic, historian, writer, and researcher. Her impactful writings and academic contributions established her as an icon of the feminist art movement and history. One of her most renowned essays, "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?," delves into the societal factors that hindered women from attaining recognition within the art world.

Commentaires